In this context, Haidar wrong. When mentioning the one-two indictments or excerpts,he did not mention the source of much less verify their validity. So please be tolerated. Did not mean arbitrary, but obey the code of ethics, which may be interpreted another. This is different from the Salaf have mentioned that the sanad complete trust,and the task of further research to verify its truth.
First,there is still a matter of Tahrif (distortion and incompleteness) of the Qur'an and Sunnah among Shiites.I affirm that Ahlusunnah absolutely accept authenticity, completeness and kemutawatiran Mushaf Usmani current - without any additional reduction and iota. But not infrequently, among Shiites accuse indication tahrif behind that found in the narrations contained in the books of hadith standards among the Sunnah. Brother Haidar has been mentioned among the examples in part.
Examples of history that smell 'Tahrif', called Haidar, very familiar in the reviewer's knowledge of the Qur'an in the study of Nasikh-mansukh. A variety of literature such as Al-Burhan (vol.2/41-46) by Az-Zarkasyi, Al-Itqon (hlm.332 & 336) As-Suyuti's work and Manahil Irfan (vol.2/154-155) by Az-Zarqani give an example Hadrat Aisha's hadith about the law 10 times the wet nurse is abrogated by 5 times the wet nurse (HR.Muslim) for the category of abrogating (the concept of abrogation) in both law and reading the Quran. While the history of Hadrat Umar about the verse of stoning (HR.Bukhari) and a history of Ubay ibn Ka'b about the verse of stoning (HR.Ibnu Hibban), serve as an example for the category abrogated on readings alone, and the law remains in force.
Assessing narrations Nasikh-mansukh categorized according to the concept of 'Ahlusunnah', and equated with 'Tahrif' is a fundamental mistake. Ahlusunnah cleric looked abrogated in the presence of Al-Quran, --- which of course is the prerogative of Allah and only Allah can occur during life and upon its authority-not a distortion (Tahrif) and the incompleteness of the Qur'an.
Excerpt from Aisha, as quoted by Haidar, that the sura of Al-Ahzab last remaining original 200 verses only 73 verses in the Mushaf Usmani, in terms of sanadnya dhoif. Because the hadith narrated by Abu Ubaid (Fadha'il author of the Qur'an) to Aisha, who rawinya Ibn Lahi'ah assessed mukhtalit (hafalannya unorganized) after the books of the bible burned, so sanadnya dhoif / weak (Mizan al- I'tidal vol.2/475-477). Similarly excerpt from Ubay ibn Ka'b that the number of surah Al-Ahzab equivalent to Al-Baqarah (286 verses), was a rawinya Fadhalah ibn Al-Mubarak is being assessed mudallis dhoif / weak, such as the assessment of Abu Dawud and Abu Zur'ah in Al-Mudallisin (vol.1/80).
Well, unlike suggested that the fact that Heydar suspected Tahrif form, again if you want to be honest, it was a history of Aisha and Ubay above by As-Suyuti was placed in the category of abrogating recitations (see hlm.336). That is, Suyuti would like to confirm that the remaining 127 or 213 verses abrogated verses have all been reading and its laws. Unless paragraph Rajam whose laws remain in force despite the recitation has been abrogated. This is reiterated by Al-Bayhaqi in As-Sunan Al-Kubra (vol.8/211), Al-Qadi Abu Bakr al-Intishar Baqillani in lil Qur'an (vol.1/406), and Ibn Hajar Asqallani in Fathul Bari (vol.12/144).
So in conclusion, the narrations it is just for context-mansukh Nasikh, and instead of proving the occurrence of Tahrif in the Quran according to Sunni clerics. Haidar as supporters of Shiite brothers should understand this problem. Equate or deliberately blurs the concept of naskh with clear Tahrif fatal error. Do not impose your way of looking at the reference Shia Sunni.
Furthermore, the second one, about the history of Ali ibn Abi Talib condemnation. I do not deny 'as is' fantastic stories contained in books chronicle the Civil Haidar mentioned. But again, the base of the oldest source of the story was narrated by Ibn Sa'd in Thabaqat. If Ali Al-Madaini be less tolerable, but the weakness is more severe because of a history teacher Madaini namely al-Lut ibn Yahya al-Kufi. He was the one who I mean all the expert and the priests judged weak hadith. Al-Siyar a'lam Dzahabi in An-Nubala (vol.7/301-302) writes: "Abu Yahya ibn Al Mikhnaf Luth-Kufi, author of the book and chronicle tasnif, narrated from Jabir al-Ju'fi, Mujalid ibn Sa 'id, Sha'qab ibn Zuhair, and a group of unknown people (majhulin) ... Yahya ibn Ma'in said: (this person Lut ibn Yahya) is not tsiqoh, Abu Hatim said: Hadith abandoned, Ad-Daruquthni said: handyman giver news the weak. In addition, Abu Mikhnaf handyman news is damaged and could not be trusted. (Mizan al-I'tidal, vol.3/409)
Citing a history of Sahih Muslim from Sahl ibn Sa'd (no.2409) is also less precise in the context of the condemnation. Because Imam Muslim hadith actually put it in Chapter Min Fadha'il Aly ibn Abi Talib (RA virtues of Ali).
It was not easy selecting the history contained in the history books, as well as analyze it fairly. Moreover, often found certain elements with political motives muddy the waters in every period of history writing.
Importantly, throughout history Ahlusunnah never defend, approve and moreover makes the condemnation of the Companions of the Prophet and the Ahl-ul-verse - especially Hadrat Ali - as a creed or a firmly entrenched resentment officially.
It is conceivable, assuming the story of the curse against Hadrat Ali for 70 years (which is doubtful) it is very disgraceful, how else condemnation of Caliph Abu Bakr and Umar, as well as the wife of the Prophet is preserved more than 1000 years-and who knows how long-?
In I'tiqad Ahlusunnah, all friends and family of the Prophet, without exception, are the noble people who are educated in madrassas nubuwwah and struggled for years to uphold the banner of Islam with the Prophet.
The sacrifice of lives, property and family is incalculable. It seems impossible, human beings repeatedly praised in the Qur'an and hadith the prophet, they instantly turn into a human at once immoral and religion just because conquest of the world's throne. Unless we want to say, that the Apostle has failed miserably in his preaching and wrong because Allah has praised the quality of their faith. This meant demeaning Allah and His Messenger, Wal'iyadzu billah!
Polemic is hopefully more insightful people, that there was a wedge-wedge in terms of theological and historical relations Sunni and Shiite Muslims. The gulf between them are also wide differences in both aspects of usul and furu faith 'religion.
To avoid the things untoward together, also for the sake of the integrity of this nation, then it is true invitation to all the elements you Haidar not preach Shiite teachings in the middle of an absolute majority Sunnis. If the appeal was not heeded seriously, frankly I fear the fate of the unity of this nation, where Muslims constitute the majority, will be ripped and torn apart. Enough is enough experience of sectarian conflict in Iraq, Lebanon and Pakistan become valuable lessons for us all.
Unfortunately, that led you Mizan Publishers Haidar, continuously since 1983 published a book entitled Dialogue Shia-Sunna-authored a fictional dialogue Sharafuddin Al-Musawi-containing slander and insult to the Prophet Muhammad's wife, especially Aisha RA
Lastly, what I write is part of tawashaw bil-bil-haq and tawashaw shabr objectively, sincere, and tajarrud on al-Haq as Mr. expectations. Haidar. To be more intelligent and mature people. And Allaah knows best .*
The author is Deputy Secretary General Council of Ulema Young Intellectuals and Indonesia (MIUMI)
No comments:
Post a Comment